Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Subir Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, Examples

The Spanish verb s​ubir  means to go up or to climb.  It is a regular -ir verb, so it has the same conjugation pattern as other regular  -ir  verbs like escribir,  compartir,  and cumplir. This article includes subir  conjugations in the indicative mood (present, past, future), the subjunctive mood (present and past) and the imperative mood (commands), as well as other verb forms, including the present and past participles. Using the Verb Subir The verb subir  can be  used in several different ways. It can mean to go up or to climb as in  Ella subià ³ por las escaleras  (She went up the stairs) or  Ella subià ³ la montaà ±a  (She climbed the mountain). It can also mean to increase, as in  La temperatura subià ³ diez grados  (The temperature increased ten degrees). Another meaning is to get on, as in  Los nià ±os subieron al autobà ºs  (The children got on the bus). The opposite of  subir  is the verb  bajar, which means to take down, go down, or to lower. Subir Present Indicative Yo subo I go up Yo subo al quinto piso en el ascensor. T subes You go up T subes la montaa rpidamente. Usted/l/ella sube You/he/she goes up Ella sube la temperatura del apartamento. Nosotros subimos We go up Nosotros subimos al tren con las maletas. Vosotros subs You go up Vosotros subs de nivel en el videojuego. Ustedes/ellos/ellas suben You/they go up Ellos suben la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir Preterite  Indicative In Spanish there are two forms of the past tense.  The  preterit tense is used to talk about completed actions in the past. Yo sub I went up Yo sub al quinto piso en el ascensor. T subiste You went up T subiste la montaa rpidamente. Usted/l/ella subi You/he/she went up Ella subi la temperatura del apartamento. Nosotros subimos We went up Nosotros subimos al tren con las maletas. Vosotros subisteis You went up Vosotros subisteis de nivel en el videojuego. Ustedes/ellos/ellas subieron You/they went up Ellos subieron la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir Imperfect  Indicative The second past tense is the  imperfect tense, which is used to talk about ongoing or habitual actions in the past, and  can be translated as was going up or used to go up. Yo suba I used to go up Yo suba al quinto piso en el ascensor. T subas You used to go up T subas la montaa rpidamente. Usted/l/ella suba You/he/she used to go up Ella suba la temperatura del apartamento. Nosotros subamos We used to go up Nosotros subamos al tren con las maletas. Vosotros subais You used to go up Vosotros subais de nivel en el videojuego. Ustedes/ellos/ellas suban You/they used to go up Ellos suban la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir  Future  Indicative Yo subir I will go up Yo subir al quinto piso en el ascensor. T subirs You will go up T subirs la montaa rpidamente. Usted/l/ella subir You/he/she will go up Ella subir la temperatura del apartamento. Nosotros subiremos We will go up Nosotros subiremos al tren con las maletas. Vosotros subiris You will go up Vosotros subiris de nivel en el videojuego. Ustedes/ellos/ellas subirn You/they will go up Ellos subirn la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir Periphrastic Future  Indicative The are three components needed to form the periphrastic future: the present tense conjugation of the verb  ir,  the preposition  a,  and  the infinitive of the verb. Yo voy a subir I will go up Yo voy a subir al quinto piso en el ascensor. T vas a subir You will go up T vas a subir la montaa rpidamente. Usted/l/ella va a subir You/he/she will go up Ella va a subir la temperatura del apartamento. Nosotros vamos a subir We will go up Nosotros vamos a subir al tren con las maletas. Vosotros vais a subir You will go up Vosotros vais a subir de nivel en el videojuego. Ustedes/ellos/ellas van a subir You/they will go up Ellos van a subir la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir Conditional  Indicative Yo subira I would go up Yo subira al quinto piso en el ascensor, pero prefiero usar las escaleras. T subiras You would go up T subiras la montaa rpidamente si tuvieras mejor condicin fsica. Usted/l/ella subira You/he/she would go up Ella subira la temperatura del apartamento si tuviera fro. Nosotros subiramos We would go up Nosotros subiramos al tren con las maletas si llegramos a tiempo a la estacin. Vosotros subirais You would go up Vosotros subirais de nivel en el videojuego si ganaras este nivel. Ustedes/ellos/ellas subiran You/they would go up Ellos subiran la escalera para llegar al techo, pero es muy peligroso. Subir Present Progressive/Gerund Form The present participle or gerund of Spanish verbs is formed with the ending -ando  for -ar verbs and -iendo for  -er and -ir verbs. The gerund of  subir  is thus  subiendo. The present participle can be used as an adverb or to form progressive tenses such as the present progressive. Present Progressive of Subir -  està ¡ subiendo   She is going up/she is increasing.  Ella està ¡Ã‚  subiendo la temperatura del apartamento. Subir Past Participle The past participle of regular Spanish verbs is formed with  the ending  -ado for  -ar  verbs and -ido  for -er  and  -ir  verbs. The past participle can be used as an adjective or to  form compound tenses like the  present perfect  and the pluperfect.   Present Perfect of Subir  -  ha subido   She has gone up/she has increased.  Ella  ha subido  la temperatura del apartamento. Subir Present Subjunctive The  present subjunctive is formed by starting with the  yo  conjugation of the present tense (subo), dropping the o, and  adding the subjunctive endings.   Que yo suba That I go up Eric quiere que yo suba al quinto piso en el ascensor. Que t subas That you go up El entrenador espera que t subas la montaa rpidamente. Que usted/l/ella suba That you/he/she go up Su compaera quiere que ella suba la temperatura del apartamento. Que nosotros subamos That we go up El conductor sugiere que nosotros subamos al tren con las maletas. Que vosotros subis That you go up Vuestro hermano quiere que vosotros subis de nivel en el videojuego. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas suban That you/they go up El jefe de obra quiere que ellos suban la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir Imperfect  Subjunctive The imperfect subjunctive has two different forms. Speakers choose one form or the other depending on regional or stylistic differences, but they are both correct. Option 1 Que yo subiera That I went up Eric quera que yo subiera al quinto piso en el ascensor. Que t subieras That you went up El entrenador esperaba que t subieras la montaa rpidamente. Que usted/l/ella subiera That you/he/she went up Su compaera quera que ella subiera la temperatura del apartamento. Que nosotros subiramos That we went up El conductor sugera que nosotros subiramos al tren con las maletas. Que vosotros subierais That you went up Carlos quera que vosotros subierais de nivel en el videojuego. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas subieran That you/they went up El jefe de obra quera que ellos subieran la escalera para llegar al techo. Option 2 Que yo subiese That I went up Eric quera que yo subiese al quinto piso en el ascensor. Que t subieses That you went up El entrenador esperaba que t subieses la montaa rpidamente. Que usted/l/ella subiese That you/he/she went up Su compaera quera que ella subiese la temperatura del apartamento. Que nosotros subisemos That we went up El conductor sugera que nosotros subisemos al tren con las maletas. Que vosotros subieseis That you went up Carlos quera que vosotros subieseis de nivel en el videojuego. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas subiesen That you/they went up El jefe de obra quera que ellos subiesen la escalera para llegar al techo. Subir Imperative   If you want to give a direct order or command, you need the imperative conjugation. Since they are direct orders, there are no imperative forms for  yo,  Ãƒ ©l/ella,  or  ellos/ellas.  The tables below show the positive and negative commands. Positive Commands T sube Go up! Sube la montaa rpidamente! Usted suba Go up! Suba la temperatura del apartamento! Nosotros subamos Lets go up! Subamos al tren con las maletas! Vosotros subid Go up! Subid de nivel en el videojuego! Ustedes suban Go up! Suban la escalera para llegar al techo! Negative Commands T no subas Dont go up! No subas la montaa rpidamente! Usted no suba Dont go up! No suba la temperatura del apartamento! Nosotros no subamos Lets not go up! No subamos al tren con las maletas! Vosotros no subis Dont go up! No subis de nivel en el videojuego! Ustedes no suban Dont go up! No suban la escalera para llegar al techo!

Monday, December 23, 2019

Rockign Horse Winner - 733 Words

The short story, â€Å"Rocking-Horse Winner†, and the movie based on it contrast considerably. When the written story has ended the movie continues with ideas, which may not come from the author. Three major differences of the two are: the mother, the father, and the ending. In the movie the mother, Hester, is portrayed as a loving and self-sacrificing person. While in the short story she is exposed to be a cold-hearted, and greedy person. Another instance where the short story and movie differ is the role of the father. In the beginning of the written story the author reveals Hester to be a cold-hearted mother. â€Å"She had bonny children, yet she felt they had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them†(75). In public she is thought of as†¦show more content†¦When Paul goes into the coma-like state his mother sits at his bedside and cries when he dies. After Paul dies Hester wants nothing to do with the money, she even tells Bassett to burn it. The heartless Hester in the written story never shed a tear when Paul died. Another major difference between the written story and the movie is the character of the father. In the short story the author only mentions him briefly. â€Å"The father went to town to some office. But though he had good prospects, these prospects never materialized†(76). Hester talks about her husband being unlucky frequently, but the husband is never present. Yet in the movie the father plays a moderately significant character. Throughout the movie he is included in the dialogue. He even stands up to Hester a couple of times. Everyday the father goes to work while trying to find a better job. Everyday when he gets home she asks if he had any luck finding a better job. When he reply’s that he didn’t have any luck, she belittles the job he does have. When the father loses the job he does have Hester and Uncle Oscar both scold him. The most important difference between the movie and the written story is when the written story ends the movie continues with ideas, which may not come from the author. The movie continues to show the viewer Hester’s reaction to Paul’s death. When Paul dies she orders Bassett to take the rocking horse out of the house and burn it. When Bassett asks her what

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Alternate Dispute Resolution Tools Free Essays

The ADR processes attempt to reconcile the differences that arise between commercial corporations. The services of a third party, which are in general voluntary, are employed for this purpose. This third party promotes negotiations, assists in resolving differences and formulates agreements that are agreeable to both the disputing parties. We will write a custom essay sample on Alternate Dispute Resolution Tools or any similar topic only for you Order Now Arbitration and mediation constitute the principal tools of ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution Overview ). There are a number of advantages of resorting to the ADR mechanism. Some of these are that the cost is much less in comparison to the judicial system. In addition, ADR brings about a rapprochement between the disputing parties, which generally improves their relations. This is due to the fact that the ADR process concentrates on the requirements of the parties, unlike a formal judicial process that focuses on the legal position of the parties. Moreover, in the mediation process, the agreement is made by the parties themselves, which ensures greater commitment than a court order and the agreement is comparatively more accommodative. Further, adoption of the ADR process does not preclude the right to resort to the traditional legal procedures (Alternative Dispute Resolution Overview ). In the mediation process a third party that is neutral and adequately trained helps the parties to resolve their dispute. The aim of this third party is to shift the focus from legal positions to the actual interests, which are affected of the parties. The mediation process is bereft of rules of evidence and lawyers. The atmosphere is informal and conducive to dispute resolution. In addition, this process is absolutely confidential and there are no records of the meetings, moreover any notes taken down by the mediators during the process are destroyed. Furthermore, the process is speedy and inexpensive. This process is ideal if time available with the parties is limited, because resolution, in general, is achieved within a couple of sessions (Alternative Dispute Resolution Overview ). In the world of adjudication, the arbitration rules of London Court of International Arbitration, the London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association Terms, the UNCITRAL and the ICC are well known. The alternative dispute resolution or ADR process suffers from the disadvantage that its decisions cannot be made sufficiently binding from the legal perspective. Such international agreements cannot be enforced by the authorities in the absence of a court decision, which would be disproportionate to the amount involved. This promotes repudiation of contracts by unscrupulous parties, because the cost of enforcing the contract would be exorbitant (Redfern Hunter, 1999. Pp. 3 – 4). Conservative estimates of litigation costs in the US legal system estimate them to be around a hundred billion dollars per annum, whereas others consider this amount to be more than three times this estimated amount. Some of the direct expenses that constitute this huge amount are legal fees, awards to the jury, expenditure incurred in copying and organizing, fees to be paid to expert witnesses. There are also a number of indirect expenses like loss of reputation that corporations have to endure and loss due to management having to curtail its business activities, in order to concentrate on the litigation. This has made ADR a very attractive alternative for many corporations in the US. If the participants in the process of the ADR approach their differences in a positive and fair manner, then this process can bring about dispute resolution that improves their commercial relations. However, if such an attitude is lacking, then the ADR process can prove to be no less time consuming and expensive in comparison to the usual judicial process for resolving commercial disputes (Netzley, December, 2001). American companies that perform in other countries generally resort to arbitration, in order to settle commercial disputes, because of the uncertainty associated with the legal systems extant in those countries. The best environment for arbitration to succeed transpires when there are only two parties that are absolutely clear about their legal status. Arbitration agreements are enforced in totality by the courts. However, the rules pertaining to evidence are not strictly adhered to in such proceedings (Sido, Dec2005 ). Although, arbitration and litigation are expensive processes, the former is more expeditious, involves less expenditure and has the added advantage of confidentiality. However, arbitration involves charges for filing that are ever on the increase and there is no scope for appealing against an arbitral decision. Mediation on the other hand is extremely flexible and much more attractive in comparison to the arbitration process, because in an arbitration process it not clear as to which party would emerge victorious. There are no losers in a mediation process; there are only parties who have agreed to resolve their differences in an amicable manner (Sido, Dec2005 ). Arbitration is akin to the traditional litigation process in many respects, whereas mediation has the advantage of being confidential and informal. Moreover, in mediation there is no compulsion to adhere to a disagreeable decision (Packer, 2004). A number of US corporations have resorted to ADR in respect of disputes, because of the prolonged and expensive procedures of the normal court and international tribunal procedures. However, in the ADR process, arbitration process is not that attractive, because it entails decisions that cannot be appealed against and in addition it is quite similar to the regular court or tribunal process. The most popular process is that of mediation, because it is more of a consultative process and the principal objective is to arrive at an agreement that takes into account, the viewpoints and interests of the parties to the dispute. Moreover, there is no compulsion to implicitly follow the decision arrived at in this process. In addition, the cost involved is also comparatively much less. References Alternative Dispute Resolution Overview . (n. d. ). Retrieved November 8, 2007, from CADR: http://www. dot. gov/ost/ogc/CADR/overview. html Netzley, M. (December, 2001). Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Business (and) Communication Strategy . Business Communication Quarterly , Vol. 64, No. 4, Pp. 83 – 89. Packer, A. J. (2004). An interview with Bill Carter. Retrieved November 8, 2007, from Oregon State Bar. Elder Law Newsletter: http://www. osbar. org/_docs/sections/elder/newsletters/elder_spring04. pdf Redfern, A. , Hunter, M. (1999. Pp. 3 – 4). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration . London: 3rd ed, Sweet Maxwell. Sido, K. (Dec2005 ). Avoiding the Courtroom Through Mediation or Arbitration . Consulting-Specifying Engineer , Vol. 38, Iss. 6, Pp. 65-66. How to cite Alternate Dispute Resolution Tools, Papers

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Organization Development Cengage Learning

Question: Discuss about the Organization Development for Cengage Learning. Answer: Introduction The article is centred on the management skills challenges by the New Zealands chief executives. The article examines the current environment and the practitioners of New Zealand who can support skill development in the complex nature of environment. Moreover, the article highlights the way the management skills can be used in achieving common agenda in the large organizations. As a result, the article has been surveyed on the New Zealands chief executives in different sectors that are public, private and not-for-profit to investigate on the implications of the management skills in the changing markets and technologies. Inertly, there are many critical issues in the articles that will be used for the analysis in the essay. Thesis Statement Hutchison and Boxall (2014) are of the view to study the critical challenges faced by the New Zealand chief executives in the current environment. The article is studied to discuss the implications on the management skills and in a fashion where human resource development can be supportive of skill development. Even though, the chief executives track the changes in the business environment but they are some managerial specialists who are not able to support their development. In the light of such issue, the business environment has been facing many fluctuations and the same has been examined by taking in consideration 265 chief executives of New Zealand. Critical Analysis On the onset of global financial crisis (GFC), New Zealand experienced decelerated growth and the national accounts experienced deficit when reviewed from the board of public expenditure. As a result, many officials left the country to achieve high values in career possibilities by emigrating to a larger economy. On the contrary, the uncertainty in New Zealand resulted due to effect of globalization. Although, New Zealand has many opportunities in primary industries whether it is high value manufacturing and services or tourism but when in crisis, the New Zealanders continued to put the economy in risk stemming in brain drain through emigration for better opportunities (Ehambaranathan, Chalapati and Murugasu 2015). The lack of management skills grew due to lack of advancement in big jobs because retaining talent had been a fundamental problems (Panahi 2012). The challenge is primarily in retaining the educated workforce and it has been seen in 1950s when New Zealand dropped form weal thiest country to 26th in OECD. This brain drain in the resource crisis led to ineffective application of management skill in New Zealand. Moreover, the article laid by Hutchison and Boxall (2014) also studied the productivity problem that had been due to lack of management resources. On the other hand, Green et al. (2011) opined, New Zealand needs to focus more on development of management capabilities, as scale and ownership within the firms seems to make a large difference. Conversely, the chief executives have been facing organizational challenges as well due to lack of management capabilities that not only substantiates uncertainty but also creates chaos in disorderly activities in produce and disequilibrium. On the other hand, according to Iravani (2011), brain drain has resulted on an economic problem that emerged as a significant human capital flight describing the emigration of educated workforce making labour-exporting economies in a self-sufficient bind. The reviewed article has been the best support to the current article, as dynamic business environment will lead to lack of capabilities in managerial skills. Moreover, in New Zealand many small firms are struggling with the productivity performance because the New Zealanders who built their career in aerospace, semiconductors, automobiles or in banking have been restricting New Zealanders skill and creating an economic motivation for migrants. Strengths of the Article The article has not only highlighted the economic aspects but also has augmented the reasons for the emigration. Moreover, it has examined as well as explained the lack of management skills in the chief executives. The article has studied the scenario on 265 chief executives and has given statistical results with graphical representation on different factors in the three sectors that is private, public and not for profit sector. The integrative approach applied in the study has been studied on three fundamental sets that is managing on stakeholders and partners, internal resources and managing renewal and uncertainty, which proves to elaborate on all different aspects of organization behaviour (Mitchell 2013). However, other researchers like Walsh, Bryson and Lonti (2002) has investigated on uncertainty while carrying out adopted managerial policies and practices to enable organizational alertness and has been stated with the study. Moreover, the authors evidently elaborate managing people based on relative challenge. However, as viewed limited resources can be managed in the hour of need by giving strategies based on the results that can be beneficial in meeting the lack of management skills in New Zealand. Nevertheless, the business undertaken by chief executives have even studied analysing the situation of changing business environment and technologies by applying strategies that are largely positive on team building, job design as well as training. On the methodology forefront, qualitative analysis used in the study has increased the reliability of the responses (Tyson 2014). Weakness of the Article The article has been carried out on a large scale but the sample does not represent the population because it was important to get a generalized as well as full picture such as one chief executive should have been taken from each organization irrespective of small or large organization. Secondly, the analysis has been made on lack of management skills but the executives have not been recorded on the deficits of skill or the needs through the responses. Thirdly, the study has conducted the study but the skill group has not been maintained in the sample for example a technical skill set would be employed in aerospace, information technology, applied engineering, etc. whereas the same cannot be applied to communication skill set required for funding base activities. Viewpoint The organizational behaviour examined on the specific article has been attributed to different effective chief executives that have prominent value and relevance in managerial skills. However, according to my viewpoint, the management skills needs to be changed with the changing environment. Moreover, the study undertaken in New Zealand has highlighted the changes that can be viewed as positive challenge for the managers. The brain drain scenario undertaken in New Zealand is because of the lack of large organizational base. As a result, chief executives have been migrating to developed nations in search of career opportunities to secure from economic threats. As depicted, the article studies the perception of the chief executives but there are key challenges that needs to be met in the environment to develop a set of effects for managerial competences. On the other hand, in the view of Daft and Marcic (2013), management skill can be further simplified and can be adaptive with good communication as well as team building skills that can helps a small organization to grow into a big one. However, there will be less migration of chief executives from country to country, as they will fill the concern for the opportunities in the domestic economy. Key Points The article by Hutchison and Boxall (2014) has examined four key points in the study. Firstly, the brain drain in a country like New Zealand is because of less of opportunities of investments as there are no renowned large organizations. However, many articles have viewed New Zealand as a positive economy that can open its prospects post immigration. The other part that holds significant importance are the stakeholders and business collaborators that helps in providing financial management as well as reliability to business innovation. The article has recommended to renew organization effectively by managers who are not only efficient to deal with complete problems but will also focus on different line managers that will bridge development process to take external part in external and internal boundaries (Cummings and Worley 2014). The other methods that will help in uplifting management skill is by giving opportunities, improving standard and quality of living and flexible work environment so that resource utilization can improve the scope of learning opportunity in growth of career in New Zealand and the chief executives no more have to face adverse challenges. Conclusion To conclude, it can be said that the critical challenges on management skills faced by New Zealanders chief executives have been evaluated on the prospect on decrease in productivity of the executives as well as the changing environment has not been able to meet by small organizations. Moreover, the emigration of educative workforce raises a talent war, as there is uncertainty and lack of reliability in New Zealand. Although, the executives emigrate to different countries for career growth but this can be restricted by developing different skills like team building, job design as well as different skills like communication, interpersonal and innovation skills. References Cummings, T.G. and Worley, C.G., 2014.Organization development and change. Cengage learning. Daft, R.L. and Marcic, D., 2013.Building management skills: An action-first approach. Cengage Learning. Ehambaranathan, E., Chalapati, S. and Murugasu, S., 2015. The Determinants of Income towards Brain Drain-The Case of Malaysians in New Zealand.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,5(1), p.212. Green R, R Agarwal, P Brown, H Tan and K Randhawa 2011. Management matters in New Zealand: How does manufacturing measure up? Ministry of Economic Development, Wellington. www .med.govt.nz/about-us/publications/publications-by-topic/occasional-papers/2011-occasional -papers/11-03-pdf (Accessed 26 Sep. 2016) Hutchison, A. and Boxall, P., 2014. The critical challenges facing New Zealand's chief executives: implications for management skills.Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,52(1), pp.23-41. Iravani, M.R., 2011. Brain drain problem: A review.International Journal of Business and Social Science,2(15). Mitchell, B., 2013.Resource environmental management. Routledge. Panahi, R., 2012. Factors affecting the brain drain from Iran.Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research,2(3), pp.3003-15. Tyson, S., 2014.Essentials of human resource management. Routledge. Walsh P, J Bryson and Z Lonti 2002. Jack be nimble, Jill be quick: HR capability and organisational agility in the New Zealand public and private sectors. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 40(2), 179194. doi: 10.1177/1038411102040002337.